完善资料让更多小伙伴认识你,还能领取20积分哦, 立即完善>
我目前有一个旧系统,可以从HP3457数字万用表中获取电压,并将其与HP激光干涉仪的位置配对。
这是一个使用HPIB,HPBasic的相当古老的系统,可以以每秒80到200对的速度获取数据(每个测量会话至少需要30,000对)。 我希望通过将速度提高2倍到4倍来改进或替换它,但我也认为现代电子设备可以轻松地将数据收集速度提高10倍或100倍。 这个系统不需要经常更改,所以如果不那么谨慎的话,我宁愿不使用labview。 我希望快100倍可能是昂贵的,这可能没问题。 测量是; 3VDC至0.001VDC,在最小100mm的距离内,位置的线性分辨率为0.1um或更好。 问题:以这种速度获得连续数据对的最佳接口是什么? GPIB PCI卡? USB GPIB能胜任这项任务吗? GPIB以外的东西? 任何真实的DVM建议,可以1000 /秒连续捕获3到0.001VDC(30,000个数据对)? 在10,000 /秒? 关于线性测量编码器的任何现实世界建议,可以输出0.1um分辨率的位置(我喜欢激光,但我怀疑即使是最新的输出位置也可以我想要的速度,因此可以考虑其他编码器)1000 / 秒? 在10,000 /秒? 谢谢大家! 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 I currently have an old system that grabs a voltage from a HP3457 DMM and pairs it with a position that comes from a HP laser interferometer. This is a rather old system using HPIB, HPBasic and can get data at 80 to 200 pairs per second (a minimum of 30,000 pairs is needed for each measurement session). I am looking to improve or replace this with a mind of increasing the speed around 2x to 4x, but am also thinking modern electronics may easily permit 10x or 100x faster data gathering. This system will not need to be changed often so I would rather not use Labview if something less pricy will do. I expect that 100x faster might be pricy and that may be ok. Measurements are; 3VDC to 0.001VDC and linear resolution for position is 0.1um or better over a distance of 100mm minimum. Questions: What is the best interface to get continuous data pairs at this speed? GPIB PCI card? Is USB GPIB up to the task? Something other than GPIB? Any real world recommendations for a DVM that can capture 3 to 0.001VDC continuously (30,000 data pairs) at 1000/ sec? at 10,000/ sec? Any real world recommendations on a linear measuring encoder that can output position at 0.1um resolution (I like the laser, but have my doubts that even the newest can output position as fast as I want, so other encoders can be considered) at 1000/ sec? at 10,000/ sec? Thanks to all! |
|
相关推荐
1个回答
|
|
由于您的激光干涉仪也有GPIB,您可以在第一时间使用GPIB,如果您使用REAL或二进制格式,它就足够快。
我拥有的所有经验都是使用PCI GPIB卡,LAN会更快,但并非所有仪器都可用。 34410A / 411A,34465A / 470A和3458A足够快,它们都可以采样10.0000 Sa / s,高达100kSa / s,也许它们只通过数字化实现最高速率。 你必须尝试,首先提到的4只是为每个内部/外部触发指定5kSa / s。 我成功地将3458A用于16位分辨率,DIGITIZING模式下的100kSa / s外部触发。 也许我还设法为我的34465A获得> 5000kSa / s每(GPIB)总线触发,但我没有达到极限。 在1000Sa / s和10.000Sa / s时,您将获得更低的分辨率,3458A可能约为6-6.5位,而465A / 470A则为5-6位。 坦率 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 As your laser interferometer has GPIB also, you might use GPIB in first instance, it's fast enough if you use the REAL or binary formats. All experience I have is with PCI GPIB cards, LAN will be faster, but is not available on all instruments. The 34410A / 411A, the 34465A / 470A and the 3458A are fast enough, they all can sample 10.0000 Sa/s, up to 100kSa/s, maybe they achieve the highest rates by DIGITIZING only. You have to try, the 4 first mentioned only were specified for 5kSa/s per internal / external triggering. I successfully used the 3458A for 100kSa/s external triggering at 16 bit resolution, DIGITIZING mode. Maybe I also managed to get > 5000kSa/s per (GPIB) bus triggering for my 34465A also, but I did not go to the limits, yet. At 1000Sa/s , and 10.000Sa/s you will have less resolution, maybe about 6-6.5 digits for the 3458A, and 5-6 digits for the 465A/470A. Frank |
|
|
|
只有小组成员才能发言,加入小组>>
1240 浏览 0 评论
2352 浏览 1 评论
2163 浏览 1 评论
2030 浏览 5 评论
2914 浏览 3 评论
983浏览 1评论
关于Keysight x1149 Boundary Scan Analyzer
713浏览 0评论
N5230C用“CALC:MARK:BWID?”获取Bwid,Cent,Q,Loss失败,请问大佬们怎么解决呀
813浏览 0评论
1240浏览 0评论
小黑屋| 手机版| Archiver| 电子发烧友 ( 湘ICP备2023018690号 )
GMT+8, 2024-11-29 15:25 , Processed in 1.851696 second(s), Total 80, Slave 61 queries .
Powered by 电子发烧友网
© 2015 bbs.elecfans.com
关注我们的微信
下载发烧友APP
电子发烧友观察
版权所有 © 湖南华秋数字科技有限公司
电子发烧友 (电路图) 湘公网安备 43011202000918 号 电信与信息服务业务经营许可证:合字B2-20210191 工商网监 湘ICP备2023018690号