完善资料让更多小伙伴认识你,还能领取20积分哦, 立即完善>
电子发烧友论坛|
全部,我正在使用PNA-X和CalPods通过多端口测试装置连接。
在调用.csa文件来配置PNA之后,我发送了一个CALPod:ENABle,用于Port1和Port 2,然后是CALPod:RECorrect:ACtive,它重新检测两个CalPods,如下所示:Recall .csa file CALPod:ENABle,CALPod:ENABle, CALPod:正确:ACTive //这应该记录两个CalPods当我加载下一个.csa文件时,Port1上的CalPod没有改变,但端口2上的CalPod有。 为了避免浪费时间在端口1上重新校正CalPod,以下是正确的吗? 回想一下下一个.csa文件(端口1上的CalPod保持不变,端口2更改)CALPod:ENABle,CALPod:RECorrect:ACTive //这条线应该只记录端口2上的CalPod,对吗? CALPod:ENABle,此时应启用,重新校准并准备好使用两个CalPods。 这一切都是正确的吗? 这是我第一次与CalPods合作,所以我不确定我在做什么。 谢谢,-Bill 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 All, I am using PNA-X with CalPods connected through a multiport test set. After recalling a .csa file to configure the PNA, I send out a CALPod:ENABle , for Port1 and Port 2 followed by CALPod:RECorrect:ACTive which recorrects both CalPods Like this: Recall .csa file CALPod:ENABle , CALPod:ENABle , CALPod:RECorrect:ACTive //This should recorrect both CalPods When I load the next .csa file the CalPod on Port1 has not changed, but the CalPod on Port 2 has. To avoid wasting time recorrecting the CalPod on Port 1 would the following be correct? Recall the next .csa file (the CalPod on Port 1 stays the same, Port 2 changes) CALPod:ENABle , CALPod:RECorrect:ACTive //This line should only recorrect the CalPod on Port 2, correct? CALPod:ENABle , At this point both CalPods should be enabled, recorrected, and ready for use. Is all of this correct? This is my first time working with CalPods, so I'm not really sure of what i'm doing yet. Thanks, -Bill |
|
相关推荐
3个回答
|
|
|
我认为这应该工作(实际上这是一个我们不检查的测试用例)。
如果它确实有效,请告诉我。 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 I think that should work (in fact it is a test case we don't check). Let me know if it does work. |
|
|
|
|
|
只是为此提供一些说明。 调用CalSet不会影响“CALPod:ENABle”命令对CalPod-to-VNA-port分配的任何更改。 此外,当您调用CalSet并进行更正时,如果您最初执行该CalSet的CALPod INITialize时,您将CalPods分配给所有'N'端口,则该CalSet中的活动校准具有错误更正条件,则 如果CalSet仍然分配了CalPod,那么CalSet的更正将期望重新记录这些相同的端口。 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 Just to provide some clarification on this. The recalling of a CalSet does not affect any change in the CalPod-to-VNA-port assignments made by the "CALPod:ENABle" command. Also, when you recall a CalSet and you go to do a RECorrect, if when you originally did the CALPod INITialize of that CalSet you had CalPods assigned to all 'N' ports the active cal in that CalSet had error correction terms for, then the RECorrect of that CalSet will expect to recorrect those same ports if they still have CalPods assigned to them. |
|
|
|
|
uwyywefwd 发表于 2018-9-12 15:45 纠正单个CalPods似乎正在起作用。 我现在遇到的问题是,如果没有启用,CalPods就不会像终端那样。 他们好像去了Hi-Z,这搞砸了我的测量。 我将在一个新的帖子中发布这个问题。 -法案 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文 Correcting single CalPods seems to be working. The problem I'm having now is that the CalPods are not acting like terminations when not enabled. They seem to go Hi-Z and this is messing up my measurements. I'll post this question in a new thread. -Bill |
|
|
|
|
只有小组成员才能发言,加入小组>>
1845 浏览 0 评论
2739 浏览 1 评论
2640 浏览 1 评论
2450 浏览 5 评论
3460 浏览 3 评论
1845浏览 0评论
417浏览 0评论
/9
小黑屋| 手机版| Archiver| 电子发烧友 ( 湘ICP备2023018690号 )
GMT+8, 2025-12-2 17:08 , Processed in 0.750956 second(s), Total 76, Slave 59 queries .
Powered by 电子发烧友网
© 2015 bbs.elecfans.com
关注我们的微信
下载发烧友APP
电子发烧友观察
版权所有 © 湖南华秋数字科技有限公司
电子发烧友 (电路图) 湘公网安备 43011202000918 号 电信与信息服务业务经营许可证:合字B2-20210191

淘帖
2903